Monthly Archives: March 2010

Elections

Today’s announcement by Gordon Brown of his 5 election pledges is perhaps the most obvious hint so far that we should be looking no further than 6th May for the general election. They say memories are short in politics but my mind is drawn back to 1997, the dawn of the new Labour administration, and the 5 pledges that Tony Blair made then. Just what, I wondered, have Labour actually delivered in the last 13 years?

Here they are with my comments underneath:

1. Cut class sizes to 30 or under for 5, 6 and 7 year-olds by using money from the assisted places scheme.

Well, they abolished the assisted places scheme, at one stroke depriving many people from poorer backgrounds of the chance of a good education at a private school. Pure vandalism and driven by the old socialist hatred of public schools and grammar schools. But was the aim achieved? Not entirely. The average class size across the UK has fallen to 24.5, but according to Civitas the number of infant school classes with more than 31 pupils has risen by 8% in the last year to 22,810.  I’d say this was a fail.

2. Fast-track punishment for persistent young offenders by halving the time from arrest to sentencing

I can’t find any data which accurately answers the question whether arrest to sentencing time has been cut. However anecdotal evidence from colleagues who work in the criminal courts suggests that it is very easy for defence lawyers to delay matters and they are assisted in this by court staff. And there is no doubt at all that the sentencing is so soft nowadays – the Government actively discourages judges from passing custodial sentences – that even if the time from arrest to sentencing has been reduced, it matters little if the criminal concerned is not dealt with appropriately. I’ll give the Government a narrow pass, but with the proviso that the pledge was a red herring in the first place.

3. Cut NHS waiting lists by treating an extra 100,000 patients as a first step by releasing £100 million saved from NHS red tape.

I’ll allow that the NHS has treated more patients in the last 13 years. But at what cost? The Government achieved its pledge in May 1999 but then finally began to realise that the target itself was distorting clinical priorities because health care proivders were being incentivised to perform quick and easy treatments rather than lengthy ones, irrespective of urgency, merely to meet the targets. By March 2002 the waiting list target was in the red. So they switched the target to one of limiting waiting times to 18 months. By and large they have kept to that, but at the cost of a massive injection of taxpayer’s money into the NHS. The Conservatives have pledged to keep the NHS budget at its current levels, but I wonder whether that is sustainable in the long run. So I’ll give them a pass, but it’s not been paid for merely by cutting red tape. Far from it.

4. Get 250,000 under-25 year-olds off benefit and into work by using money from a windfall levy on the privatised utilities.

They achieved this, but given that they were elected on a rising economic tide, wouldn’t they have achieved it anyway? And now that we’re in a downturn there is little sign that the New Deal is putting people who have been made redundant lately back into work. 

5. No rise in income tax rates, cut VAT on heating to 5 per cent and inflation and interest rates as low as possible

Failure, abject failure. Income tax has now been increased to 50% for top earners. Taxes as a whole have been dramatically increased for everyone.  The Government is massively in debt and the interest which the Government presenlty has to pay on its borrowings will soon feed through to consumer interest rates. Historically very low they may be, but whoever wins the election will see them going up in the next financial year. As David Cameron said at PMQs on Wednesday, the one rule of economics that always holds good is that you can never trust Labour with the public finances.

Time for change and that change is I hope now no more than 40 days away.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Carluccio’s

I have recently received a number of emails from people interested in an application by Carluccio’s, the well-known Italian deli and restaurant, to open in one of the vacant sites on the High Street in Cobham. Virtually all the people who took the trouble to write to me were in favour of the application, and all believed that I have some power to influence the decision.

The initial decision is taken by a planning officer by applying national and local planning law to the application. He has refused the application, for the following reasons:

The proposed application would result in the percentage of non-retail frontages within a designated Town Centre location to exceed the 33% threshold as defined within saved policy STC6 of the Replacement Elmbridge Borough Local Plan 2000, furthermore given the prominent location of the existing retail unit, insufficient justification has been provided to warrant departing from this saved policy. It is therefore considered to result in harm to the prime retail function and the retail vitality and viability of Cobham Town Centre.
Reason: S106 Code of Practice Reason for Refusal The application does not propose to make any payments for Infrastructure and Service Contributions in accordance with the Council’s Section 106 Code of Practice for Planning Infrastructure Contributions, which took effect for new proposals submitted after 1 July 2007. This code was prepared as a collaboration with Surrey County Council and other Surrey Districts after consultation in order to take account of the cumulative impact of small scale developments and was commended in the Panel Report on the South East Plan. As a result the proposal is also contrary to saved Policies GEN4, HSG1 and LER4 of the Replacement Elmbridge Borough Local Plan 2000, Policy DN1 of the Surrey Structure Plan 2004, Policy LF5 of the emerging South East Plan (as proposed to be amended by the Panel) and national advice in Circular 05/2005.

 

As a Councillor I have no input into this decision. The town centre does not fall within the ward which I represent and accordingly I do not have the power to promote this decision to the West Area Planning Sub-Committee. Only those councillors who do represent the relevant ward (Cobham Downside) may do so.

So for the time being at least, the nearest Carluccio’s will remain the one in Esher, which I can personally recommend, having celebrated a recent High Court victory there with my wife. Food and service are excellent!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

2 hot issues

There are two issues of great concern here in Cobham.

First, there is the new fence being erected around the Leg o’Mutton field. The old fence was made of wood and was coming to the end of its useful life, and the new fence is made of metal. It is being painted black as I write, but when first installed it was a very unattractive gun metal grey and attracted a lot of adverse comment, particularly from members of the Cobham Conservation & Heritage Trust.

The second issue is how to control parking in the town centre. At present there is a free car park at Waitrose which is often so full that a queue forms to gain entry. There is another free car park off the High Street which is also frequently full. Then there are pay and display car parks in Cedar Road and Downside Bridge Road. These are hardly ever full. The two main shopping streets, the High Street and Church Street are completely unregulated and consequently are used for all day parking by those who work in the businesses in the town centre. Oakdene Parade, which runs parallel to the High Street and Anyards Road, allows limited free parking.

Surrey CC are consulting about installing metered parking along the High Street and Church Street. The Chamber of Commerce is concerned that this will deter shoppers who will just drive off to Brooklands or Sainsburys where there is unlimited free parking.

What are your views? I am genuinely interested in knowing what local residents think and will pass on any comments received the relevant authorities.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized